ABSTRACT
Objective:To explore the feasibility of applying quantitative flow ratio(QFR) to assess the degree of coronary artery functional stenosis before surgery, and to guide coronary artery bypass grafting(CABG) revascularization strategy.Methods:The study prospectively included a total of 154 patients who were electively treated with CABG in the 11th ward of the Department of Cardiac Surgery of Beijing Anzhen Hospital from January 2019 to September 2020, and their coronary angiography visually showed stenosis of the coronary artery to perform QFR analysis to know the diseased blood vessels. For functional stenosis, the surgeon was blinded to the results of QFR analysis before surgery. Collect its baseline data, perioperative data and recent clinical outcomes for summary analysis.Results:One year later, the coronary artery CTA showed that the occlusion rate of functionally significant disease(QFR<0.8) was 5.5%, and that of non-functionally significant disease(QFR≥0.8) was 15.6%. There was no difference in angina class or repeat interventions between patients with or without occluded bypass grafts.Conclusion:According to QFR analysis, coronary arteries with functional non-significant disease have a higher risk of grafts failure than those with functionally significant disease. For coronary arteries with negative QFR lesions, the risk of occlusion of arterial grafts is higher than that of venous. However, this finding is not significantly related to clinical prognosis, because patients with patency or occlusion of the grafts in non-significant lesions have not found excessive angina pectoris or repeated coronary interventions. QFR-guided selection of coronary surgery strategies is safe and feasible.
ABSTRACT
Objective: To analyze the feasibility, safety and preliminary clinical results of quantitative flow ratio (QFR)-guided surgical coronary revascularization. Methods: From Jan 2018 to June 2019 at the Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, patients undergoing elective cardiac surgery with any coronary stenosis ≥ 50%, evaluated by preoperative coronary angiography visualization, were enrolled consecutively. There were 82 patients with 174 coronary artery vessels. Coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) was recommended with a QFR value ≤ 0.8. The data of baseline characteristics, surgical procedure and perioperative outcomes were collected and analyzed. Results: QFR analysis was successfully carried out in 82 patients and 174 coronary artery vessels. QFR was detected positive ( ≤ 0.8) in 53 vessels (30.5%) and negative (>0.8) in the remaining 121 vessels (69.5%). As guided with QFR, 39 patients (47.6%) with 62 vessels (35.6%) proceeded to surgery for primary heart disease with concomitant CABG as planned, while the remaining 43 patients (52.4%) with 112 vessels (64.4%) changed revascularization strategy or spared CABG. Fifteen patients with simple coronary artery disease avoided CABG and discharged. Among the remaining 67 patients operated on, there were 2 deaths, 4 hemodialysis for new renal failure, 1 perioperative myocardial infarction and 1 stroke within 30 d. No unplanned revascularization was observed. The composite adverse events occurred in 6 cases (9.0%). Conclusion: QFR-guided surgical coronary revascularization is feasible and safe. This strategy could reduce the unnecessary bypass grafting. Further follow-up and prospective clinical trials are warranted to evaluate the effectiveness.
ABSTRACT
Abstract Introduction: Quantitative flow ratio (QFR) is a novel method enabling efficient computation of FFR from three-dimensional quantitative coronary angiography (3D QCA) and thrombolysis in myocardial infarction (TIMI) frame counting. We decided to perform a systematic review and quantitative meta-analysis of the literature to determine the correlation between the diagnosis of functionally significant stenosis obtained by QFR versus FFR and to determine the diagnostic accuracy of QFR for intermediate coronary artery stenosis. Methods: We searched PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science for studies concerning the diagnostic performance of QFR. Our meta-analysis was performed using the DerSimonian and Laird random effects model to determine sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio (LR+), negative likelihood ratio (LR-), and diagnostic odds ratio (DOR). The sROC was used to determine diagnostic test accuracy. Results: Nine studies consisting of 1175 vessels in 1047 patients were included in our study. The pooled sensitivity, specificity, LR+, LR-, and DOR for QFR were 0.89 (95% CI: 0.86-0.92), 0.88 (95% CI: 0.86-0.91), 6.86 (95% CI,: 5.22-9.02), 0.14 (95% CI: 0.10-0.21), and 53.05 (95% CI: 29.75-94.58), respectively. The area under the summary receiver operating characteristic (sROC) curve for QFR was 0.94. Conclusion: QFR is a simple, useful, and noninvasive modality for diagnosis of functional significance of intermediate coronary artery stenosis.